7 MIN READ · SURFACE TECH INDUSTRIES
ASTM B117 is one of the most-cited standards on a surface finishing drawing, and one of the most misunderstood. B117 describes the test method — the salt fog chamber, the 5% NaCl solution, the temperature and exposure conditions — it does not by itself define a pass or fail. That comes from the governing specification, and reading a salt spray report without that context tells you less than it looks like it does.
A B117 report typically reports hours-to-first-visible-corrosion for a given panel. What counts as "corrosion" depends on the coating: on zinc-plated steel, white rust (zinc oxide corrosion products) is often expected to appear before red rust (base steel corrosion) does — and depending on the governing spec, some amount of white rust within a defined window may be acceptable, not automatically a failure. Reading the raw hours-to-corrosion number without knowing which corrosion product triggered it, and what the spec allows, can lead to the wrong conclusion in either direction.
Salt fog exposure is accelerated and artificial — it doesn't perfectly correlate to real-world atmospheric or marine exposure, and two coatings that perform identically in a B117 chamber can behave differently in the field. That's why a competent quality review reads salt spray results alongside coating thickness data (per ASTM B499) and adhesion testing (per ASTM D3359, tape test or equivalent), not as a standalone pass/fail line. A thin, well-adhered, uniform coating can outperform a thicker but porous one — and thickness plus adhesion data is what explains why.
A salt spray number in isolation is a headline. The underlying process control — thickness, adhesion, and what the governing spec actually requires — is what tells you whether the finish will hold up.
Our process engineers can review it directly.